Welcome to Fishhunter Q&A, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.

Plotted Kaplan-Meier survival curves and conducted log-rank tests for overall survival

0 votes
Additional to investigate no matter if <a href="https://www.medchemexpress.com/Azeliragon.html">Azeliragon Biological Activity</a> syntenin is definitely an independent prognostic aspect, we performed multivariate evaluation with the Cox proportional hazards model. (E, F) U0126 effectively decreased the migration and invasion of <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27484364" title=View Abstract(s)">PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27484364</a> breast cancer cells. GAPDH was applied as loading manage. Data are expressed as suggests of triplicate samples from three independent experiments; bars, SD. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.Yang et al. Breast Cancer Research 2013, 15:R50 http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/15/3/RPage 10 ofFigure 5 Elevated expression of syntenin correlates with poor patient survival. (A) Representative images of syntenin immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining. a: Negative control consisted of phosphate-buffered saline instead of syntenin antibody. b-f: IHC staining of paraffin-embedded tumors formed by 231-VEC (b), 231-SYN (c), 231HM-VEC (d), 231HM-262 (e), and 231HM-622 (f) cells. g-i: Representative images of paracarcinoma (g) and carcinoma (h: negative, i: positive). (B, C) Kaplan-Meier survival analyses of breast cancer patients. (B) OS (P = 0.023). (C) DFS (P = 0.001). P values were calculated by using the log-rank test.Yang et al. Breast Cancer Research 2013, 15:R50 http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/15/3/RPage 11 ofTable 2 Multivariate analysis of overall survival by Cox proportional hazards modelsPatients Tumor size T1 versus T2 versus T3 Grade, I versus II versus III Lymph node status, negative versus positive Syntenin, negative versus positive P 0.076 0.769 0.381 0.049 Hazard ratio (95  confidence interval) ???2.031 (1.002-4.117)[HR: 2.281(95  CI 1.355 to 3.841), P = 0.002, Table 3] in our cohort of patients.Discussion In the present study, we provide the first evidence that syntenin expression is upregulated in breast carcinoma, and the elevated expression <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29072704" title=View Abstract(s)">PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29072704</a> of syntenin confers a high threat of recurrence. Additionally, our final results suggest a function of syntenin overexpression in promoting tumor development and metastatic spreading in breast carcinoma. Not too long ago, observations indicated that syntenin is upregulated in many cancer cells and tissues and may perhaps regulate tumor cell invasion and meta.Plotted Kaplan-Meier survival curves and carried out log-rank tests for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The outcomes indicated that the expression degree of syntenin was correlated with OS (P = 0.023; Figure 5B) and DFS (P = 0.001; Figure 5C). Further to investigate whether or not syntenin is definitely an independent prognostic factor, we performed multivariate analysis with the Cox proportional hazards model. The outcomes showed that syntenin status was an independent prognostic issue for OS (hazard ratio (HR): 2.031 (95  CI, 1.002 to four.117); P = 0.049, Table 2] and DFSYang et al. Breast Cancer Research 2013, 15:R50 http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/15/3/RPage 9 ofFigure four Activation of integrin b1 and ERK1/2 is essential for syntenin-induced migration and invasion. (A) Silencing of syntenin in MDA-MB-231HM cells inhibited active integrin b1 expression and phosphorylation of ERK1/2, but had no effects on JNK and p38. (B) Overexpression of syntenin enhanced active integrin b1 expression and ERK1/2 phosphorylation in 231-SYN cells.
asked Apr 2 by leeknose0 (360 points)

Your answer

Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
...